17 December 2012

The Uninvited Guests - Sadie Jones


Soooooo this post has sat open on my Chrome desktop for literally a week [not a figurative week, you understand. An actual week, according to my Remember the Milk reminder (shameless plug - I love that app!)]. Just sitting there in my tabs, an empty post with the exception of the cover up there *points up*.

It's not because this book was bad; on the contrary, it was really quite good. It's not because I can't think of anything to say; I've got about 300 things I could mention, but decorum and modesty (read: a hatred of spoilers) forbids it. It *may* have to do with what appears to be my need to ruminate on books after I've read them, which doesn't mesh well with my tendency to prioritize my TBR pile by what's already overdue at the library.


Back to the story! It's Edwardian England, and this does not appear to be Sadie Jones's first authorial rodeo, based solely on the lack of sentence fragments in her book.

This one's for Jer.
Ok for real. It is Emerald Torrington's birthday, and there is going to be a party! But then the house gets word via the newfangled telephone that there's been a horrible train crash and refugees will be sent and they must take care of them. And what follows is a hugely intriguing story that I won't tell you about because of my EXTREME DELICACY. Or, you know, spoilers. But it's a bit of a combination of Wilde and Wharton with maybe a dash of King.

I particularly liked Florence, who describes tea as "the most labour-intensive and least productive substance on Earth...A feeble drink unchanged by passing through the body" (58). HAH! I love tea, but there's a reason people invented individual tea bags and the electric kettle. Pip pip, Old Bean.

Go read it! You'll like it! And if you've already read it,*

8.5 out of 11 mysterious phone calls
























*let's have a discussion in the comments about the difference between zombies and ghosts. I have serious opinions, people.

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Spoiler-y comment ahead:

I did read this one, and during the first half of the book my instincts were all, "Zombies? Can that be what's happening here?" and turns out that I was not far off. It came as a big surprised, and not an entirely pleasant one. For while I'm not against the insertion of zombies into novels of manners (and manors) per se, I do like to have the heads-up so I can adjust my expectations.

Not sure why Jones called them ghosts. Much more like zombies.
1 reply · active 641 weeks ago
Ok see, THIS is what I'm talking about! I think they definitely blur the line between zombies and ghosts. IF the definition of ghost is that they can't affect the physical world, then yes, these "ghosts" are in fact "zombies." But then where do poltergeists live on that spectrum? AGGHHHH THESE ARE IMPORTANT THINGS!!

I do lean on the side of this being a ghost story, but I went in expecting zombies.
I NOW KNOW THAT THERE ARE GHOSTS OR ZOMBIES, SO THANKS GUYS.

But now that I know this, it does sound way cooler. Hmm. *ponders*
1 reply · active 641 weeks ago
I seem to recall giving AMPLE spoiler warning, MISS THING!

It's interesting. I liked it.
"it's a bit of a combination of Wilde and Wharton with maybe a dash of King"
Say whaaat? I might want to bring this on my holiday travels.
2 replies · active 641 weeks ago
34 holds on 8 copies?! *sighs* *makes it 35*
UGH BOOO! I seem to recall waiting forever, too.

Maybe "holiday travels" simply refers to what you'll be reading in NEW YORK with us for BEA!!
Emerald Torrington? +10 for names, Author.

I will put this on my massive TBR list because YOU HAVE MADE IT SOUND INTERESTING.
1 reply · active 641 weeks ago
I sorta want to read this if only so I can participate in the discussion about ghosts vs zombies and their differences
1 reply · active 641 weeks ago
Oh well. now that it's spoiled, go ahead! LOL

Post a new comment

Comments by