10 September 2012

The Little Stranger - Part the First


This read-a-long is brought to you by The Estella Society, which is amazing and about which I am very excited. 




I don't read scary stories because I hate being scared. Haaaate it. This irritates the crap out of my brothers, but it's probably their fault since they liked nothing better when we were young than to jump out at me and make me scream like the little girl I was. Horror movies are Right Out; I had to be convinced by at least 3 other people - also avoiders of scary - that Cabin in the Woods (2011) was something I'd like, and even then I took a boy I could clutch in times of distress (I did like it, by the way, despite the boy turning out to be sub-par. You probably would, too).

You know how sometimes you have to revisit things to see if you still hate them? Like Brussels sprouts or fish or chardonnay? This read-a-long is me figuring out whether I still hate scary stories.

And guess what? I STILL DO.

I hate the creeping fear, I hate the gnawing dread, I hate that characters haven't read the blurb on the back of the book so they don't know they're living in a scary story so they do things like go down into the basement or up into the attic or insist on living in a mouldering old wreck of a CLEARLY HAUNTED HOUSE.


So there's this family living in a Clearly Haunted House, and they're Barely Hanging On because it's post-WWII Britain and everyone's still on rationing and the gentry are all a-wail because their parks are being broken up and they have to sell their five zillion horses, boo hoo. And in comes the Good Doctor character, our narrator, who has no premonitions, no precognitions, no nothing! As a good doctor should, but as a Good Scary-Story Narrator should most definitely not. He's a bit of a jerk, really, and I don't much like him. So there.

And shit starts happening and of course the servant figures it out first because servants are the Salt of the Earth and all. But does anyone listen to poor little Betty? NO THEY DO NOT. So I'm laying in bed reading this and getting alternately terrified of finding little black marks on my walls and annoyed with everyone in the book for being so veddy, veddy stiff-upper-lip English and practical.

And also sugar and petrol rationing. 

Sarah Waters, I miss your lesbian sexytimes, but I will finish this because I have to know what (if anything) will happen so I can sleep at night and also I have the palette-cleansing Tipping the Velvet in my TBR pile. It turns out that when you actually go into the stacks at the library instead of just from the door to the hold shelf to the checkout machine, there are other books for you to read!

Technology, you make me lazy.

Comments (25)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Love this post! I too have problems with super creepy things, but somehow I didn't have problems with this book. Kinda weird. Course, this was my second read-through, and all I can remember of the first time was how much I loved the book, so I've probably forgotten how much it freaked me out the first time. I tend to forget these things.

Poor little Betty indeed.
1 reply · active 659 weeks ago
Hah, thanks! I think I'm not creeped out because Waters doesn't sustain the tension for long enough before she reverts to everyday kinds of stuff like driving and chucking people into asylums. I just work myself up to "OH GIRL DON'T GO UPSTAIRSSSSS!" and then... she doesn't, so good for her. She gets to live another day.
"the gentry are all a-wail" - bahahaha. So now I sorta want to read this cos I like the scary and I want to see the stiff-upper-lipped English gents in this situation.
4 replies · active 659 weeks ago
Dude, I feel like we are left out of this. But NO TIME FOR A READALONG THIS MONTH.
AGREED. On both
*whispers* I don't actually really like the book. So you're not missing much. We'd never read such a duff book for a readalong *COUGH* The Help *COUGH COUGH*
I think we might have if we thought it was Sarah Waters and not Sarah Waters Does Ghosts Badly.

But it would be funnier with all of Us.
Waaait I've never noticed doctors as being the precognition dudes. They're always the ones who're like "What-ho and so forth, this is all superstitious tommyrot."

TIPPING THE VELVET: SO MANY TIMES OF SEXY
4 replies · active 659 weeks ago
That's because they're not and you are correct. But maybe sometimes you read too fast. :P

I am very excited about Tipping the Velvet! And possibly also the other one that's not Fingersmith, which I read before I KNEW about Sarah Waters and her lesbians, so I was all, "what the what, plot point?" and then all "WHAT? YESSSS!" later on.
I DID NOT READ FAST YOUR PHRASING WITH COMBINING POSITIVES AND NEGATIVES WAS CONFUSING

Are you talking about Affinity? Because that is soooooo barely gay. The movie was way better, weirdly enough. I did a quick picspam for it here: http://jennachipmunkface.tumblr.com/post/15927719...
WELL I'M SORRY SO THERE NOW EVERYTHING IS BETTER!

And yes, Affinity! Thank you for the warning; I'll read that first and Tipping the Velvet second so I don't get all excitable. Like for THIS book. Hmpf.
ANYthing of Sarah Waters' after TtV is a disappointment. Not her fault. She just started out with ALL the sexytimes and then afterwards did less and less. Sigh.
LMAO! A most excellent post indeed, and The Estella Society thanks you (and totally wants you to submit something!!!). I have a problem with scary, too, and this is the most effective-on-me type of scary. The kind of scary you can't necessarily see that is far more psychological and far less "killer in the woods." Your post had me cracking up! I also have Tipping the Velvet in my stacks!
1 reply · active 659 weeks ago
Thank you! What a lovely compliment; I'd be happy to submit something!

Psychological scary is The Worst. I get night terrors - for which I ALSO blame my brothers. You'd think 6 boys would be more protective of their only sister, but NO. Jerks.
So, I am finding this not at all scary (I am used to Stephen King, I'm sorry!) and kind of irritating, and I'm just like SOMETHING HAPPEN ALREADY. Plus, no lesbians! :(

Still, I am leaving you hugs for when it actually gets scary... I mean, scary-er! Obviously. Ahem. Anyway *HUGS*
3 replies · active 659 weeks ago
I'm now 40 pages from the end and it's not scary, but I will save my hugs because HUGS!!

And stuff happens. But I'm kind of like, eh? I think I'd like it better (and be more creeped out) if the doctor believed more in the possibility of the house being truly haunted instead of being all, "this is all in your imagination, silly woman! Let's chuck you in an asylum - but tomorrow."

Stephen King is the reason I don't read scary any more. There was an actual night terrors incident when I was 13 and read Cujo too late. Yuck.
I'm not convinced that the doctor is all that observant, unless he really thinks that women usually show their enjoyment of your embraces by hanging slackly in your arms . . . :(
Yea, "observant" is not a word I'd use to describe him.
Hilarious review and oh so true! I didn't even consider the fact that doctor Faraday is obnoxious... but he is!! I don't like him much either. Unlike you, I like scary stories and as far as this one goes, it's downright boring. It can't live up to the least scary book written by Stephen King. I want something to happen. I want Caroline, Rod, their mother and most of all the doctor ripped to shreds by this horrific little stranger!
1 reply · active 658 weeks ago
Thank you! :) I finished the book the next day and was really disappointed; the hair on the back of my neck went up a few times, but overall I just wanted to smack everyone around a little.

I think the real failing of the novel - and this will come up again with gifs on the 17th - is that the tension isn't sustained very well. I wasn't worried for the characters for more than a paragraph before the scene shifted and everything went back to "normal."
Oh my god. Thank you for this review. I'll say up front that I enjoyed the book when I read it, but I came in with low expectations and no King-esque expectations. But I love your review. There's definitely something about living in a Clearly Haunted House.

(Also, I'm going to try to watch The Cabin in the Woods tonight.)
1 reply · active 658 weeks ago
Hah, you're welcome! My expectations were high because Waters does the Very Complicated Plot thing so well, but sadly that didn't translate into spine-tingling ghosties.

Did you end up watching Cabin in the Woods? Did you loooove it?
So funny. I haven't found it too scary for some reason and I usually don't do scary either. Granted, I haven't read it at night, so there's that. I also was so annoyed that no one would believe Betty. Poor Betty.
1 reply · active 658 weeks ago
Poor Betty, indeed! Maybe her middle name was Cassandra... I hope she grew up and married her soldier or whomever and forgot about the weird shit that happened to her. After all, who among us remembers 15 with perfect clarity?

I have all the things to say about this book now that I've finished it, so maybe I should go write up my second post for tomorrow. Yes! I think I will.
Thank you for that Whoopi pic - it made me laugh. By the mid-point, I still wasn't sure if there was paranormal stuff afloat, ectoplasm gelling down the walls kind of stuff going on, or just the average abnormal human behavior.

This is my first Sarah Waters book and I definitely want to check out more.

Post a new comment

Comments by